Valid
The available evidence supports a positive mailbox result at the time of checking.
Read email verification
RefreshList separates the core verification outcome from additional signals and provider reasons. This guide explains what each status says, what it does not say, and what to do next.
Plain-language reference · Statuses describe checking evidence, not a delivery promiseStart with the core outcome: valid, invalid, or unknown. Then read the provider code and reason. Finally, check for additional signals such as catch-all, role-based, or disposable classification. Never treat a missing signal as a confirmed negative finding, and never convert unknown into invalid or valid.
The available evidence supports a positive mailbox result at the time of checking.
Read email verificationThe evidence is inconclusive. Keep the row visible and preserve the reason instead of guessing.
Understand unknown email resultsThe available evidence supports a conclusive failure for the checked address. Keep the provider reason attached.
Understand invalid email resultsA provider response can indicate that a server accepted the verification conversation. It cannot establish permission, monitoring, sender reputation, or future delivery.
Read the methodologyThese provider codes remain attached to result rows so your team can review the evidence without reconstructing the job.
A role-based address can be valid. A catch-all domain can accept a recipient without proving the mailbox. A disposable flag can describe a dataset match without proving intent. Read each signal alongside the outcome and coverage.
Read the verification guideRefreshList does not add a confidence percentage to make an inconclusive answer look precise. The reason and checking context remain visible.
A result is the core verification conclusion, such as valid, invalid, or unknown. A signal describes additional context, such as role-based, catch-all, or disposable, when supported. A signal does not replace the core outcome.
No. Unknown means the available evidence was not conclusive. Keep it separate, retain the provider reason, and decide whether a later first-party interaction or a controlled recheck is appropriate.
It indicates domain-level acceptance for many recipient names. It does not prove that the individual mailbox exists or is monitored. Treat it as a catch-all signal, not as a guaranteed valid inbox.
No. Statuses describe available evidence at the checking moment. Sender reputation, consent, content, policy, timing, and later mailbox changes can still affect delivery.
Completed unique checks use one credit, including conclusive and unknown outcomes. Rows skipped during local preflight and duplicate rows are excluded before provider verification.
Keep the evidence together before deciding what happens next.